Annoying Salesperson or Trusted Expert

January 5th, 2010 1 comment »

In the wonderful world of customer dis-service, it’s easy to find sales guys that seem to not understand what their job is as sales guys.  How many times have you walked into a retail establishment to invest in some kind of electrical or electronic device, appliance, or whatever, and walk out feeling not-so-thrilled about your purchase?  Well, I would imagine the experience might go kinda like this:

Buyer: “Hello, I’m interested in buying a new TV”
Salesperson thinks to self, “Which TV pays me the most today”
Salesperson: “Can I interest you in this beauty right here?  It’s a great product, and xyz is a GREAT brand.”
Buyer: “Ummm…  is that gonna work with the rest of my stuff?”
Salesperson: “This TV should be able to handle anything you want to throw at it, It’s got plenty of hookups and a great picture!  Would you like to take it with you, or schedule a delivery?”
Buyer: “Does it have a warranty?”
Salesperson: “Yeah, the manufacturer warranty that comes with it doesn’t cover very much though.  I highly recommend investing in our Protection Plan.  It includes in-home service if you have a problem with it.”
“Also, you may want to consider letting our experts set up your TV, they will optimize your display for the best picture.”
Buyer: “How much does that cost?”
Salesperson: “It requires an additional investment of $299, but it’s well worth it, let me show you our demo.”
Buyer: “No thanks, I’ll just take the TV.”
Salesperson: “Do you want to extend the warranty as well, as we discussed?  These things can give you a lot of trouble if you go through the manufacturer.”
Buyer: “I thought you said xyz was a great brand.”
Salesperson: “It is, but almost any of these will probably give you problems at some point, so it’s best to stay protected.”
Buyer: “Can I buy it later?”
Salesperson: “Unfortunately, we cannot extend the warranty after you purchase and take it home.”
Buyer: “Well, I guess I have no choice but to take it now.”
Buyer thinks to self, maybe I should have gone somewhere else

Is there any reason whatsoever you should trust this salesperson is trying to sell you a product that meets your needs? Has he or she given you any reason to trust anything that they say?

So how do we know the difference between the two?  Here’s some indicators:

A good salesperson, (or trusted expert,) will “qualify” you. Qualifying is basically like interviewing you in order to determine which product is the best fit for you.  There are some good things to know about before one can honestly recommend an appropriate product.  What kind of TV do you watch?  Are you a gamer?  Relentless movie watcher?  Sports addict?  Do you have cable?  Satellite?  What are you gonna hook up to it?  I know to some this might come across almost like an interrogation, but my theory is if you approach a salesperson, and they don’t immediately ask you four or five questions about how you intend to use the product, you should find another salesperson.

A trusted expert should be enthused and knowledgeable about the products he or she is selling. If you are not an expert, but know more about the products than your salesperson, then chances are they aren’t serious about their career as a salesperson, and won’t be serious about helping you invest in the right product for you.  I fix computers for a living, and by extension, I live on tech blogs.  If I were looking to buy a cell phone, and my salesperson had never heard of phonescoop, I’d be done with him/her.

Salespeople on commission are more likely to be Trusted Experts, than Annoying Salespeople. A lot of people think of commissioned salespeople as pushy types just trying to get a sale, but of you have a good commissioned salesperson, they don’t want the product coming back because they didn’t do their job.  Trust me, it’s hard when you’re trying to reach a sales quota, and have to work extra hard because you’re trying to make up for returns too.  Also, as a salesperson, when you’ve spent time with someone, and found the best product for them, it’s only polite that they ask you for the sale.  It’s not pushy, it’s like asking for your paycheck on payday.  That’s not to say that non-commissioned salespeople can’t do a good job too though.

If you’re in the process of looking for a new computer, make sure your sales guy or gal takes the time to determine what kind of user you are, what you plan on using your computer for, or any special needs you may have.  Make sure they sell you what you need, and not necessarily what’s in their best interests to sell.  Also, check out my previous post, A Word On Warranties for advice regarding those pesky service plans.

Share

Off-Topic Post: The future of Television

December 1st, 2009 No comments »

It wasn’t that long ago that we finally made the DTV switch, and killed the analog TV broadcasts that we all grew up with and love, but progress is progress, right? It took all of 70 years to upgrade from traditional analog broadcast to the current newer digital format, so the new format should last plenty long as well? My answer: Prolly not.

Analog TV from the 50's

Clearing out the spectrum and nuking the analog TV broadcasts makes the way for something remarkable. High-speed city-wide internet access. It won’t be long now before people in those rural areas that couldn’t get high speed internet before will start reaping the benefits, and getting some high-speed in those previously unreachable areas.

So what does that have to do with the future of TV? Well, here’s the thing. Once high-speed internet reaches everyone, It is highly likely that IP television broadcasts will become mainstream. I already have IP based internet TV in my home in the form of AT&T U-Verse. Once high-speed internet reaches every home, the FCC should be able to reclaim those frequencies for more creative uses as well.

Don’t expect Blu-Ray to survive too much longer either. With netflix, youtube, and the like streaming HD broadcasts to everything from TV’s, video game consoles, and computers everywhere, well let’s just say I don’t know If I’d be rushing out to Blockbuster when I can fire up a HD movie on my set without leaving the house.

Why is IPTV better? It’s better use of bandwidth.  With traditional cable or satellite TV, you’ve got this pipe chock full of broadcasts coming in to your home, and you use some sort of tuner to select which one of those broadcasts you want to watch.  So say you’ve got 3 TV’s in your home.  You might be watching 3 different TV programs at a time, while around 75-150+ different channels are being pushed down the wire.  Needless to say, there’s a whole bunch of wasted bandwidth.  With IPTV, your devices only receive the channels you want to watch (or record) at that time.  When you change the channel, you’re simply switching to another feed on another network.  No bandwidth is wasted by channels you aren’t watching.  Anybody order a plate of better picture?

Give it 5-10 years, and Maybe over the air digital broadcast will be dead as well. What will you do with all that bandwith, FCC?

Share

Laser Printers, Environmentally Unsound?

November 3rd, 2009 No comments »

Recently, I was asked to visit my wife’s place of employment to look at some equipment that had been sitting in her company’s back room collecting dust.  Her boss was hoping that I could help her determine if any of it was of value, or otherwise get rid of it.  Of course, electronic devices are supposed to be disposed of properly or recycled, and you’re not supposed to just throw it in the dumpster.  So I ended up taking a boatload of old computer stuff home with me to test and see if any of it was worth anything.

Several devices I ended up taking were various laser printers, including a couple Dells, HPs, and a Brother or two.  A couple of these printers were actually inoperable, but the majority of them just needed consumable parts replaced.

A Brother HL Series Laser Printer

This is where the environmental part kicks in.  Two of the printers, for example, were Dell 1700 laser printers, which most likely retailed for about $199 when they were brand spankin’ new.  Now you might get about 3000 pages out of the toner cartridge that comes with the printer, but replacing it when it runs out would set you back $78 bucks for another 3k pages, or $99 for a 6k cartridge, (assuming you sent the old cartridges back.)  You’d pay even more if you didn’t ship back your old ones.  This is all, of course, understandable.  Cost of doing business, right?

The problem is, the toner isn’t the only “consumable” part in the device.  There’s this other thing that has to be replaced after about 30k copies (on the dell.)  So what happens when you need a new imaging drum?  do you go out and fork over the other $50 bucks or so to replace it?  I fear that most people don’t!

Let’s pick on Brother for a minute.  One of the things I like a lot about Newegg.com is that I can buy with confidence from their site because there are a whole heap of customer reviews.  So for kicks and grins, I went over to their site to look up laser printers, and found one of the most popular models, The  Brother HL-2170W laser printer.  The replacement drum for that printer is the DR360 Drum unit which costs about $99 (it was on sale for $69 when I wrote this article.)  The replacement toner carts were also reg price $45 – $65 for regular or the latter for high yield carts.  So to sum up:  About 12,000 pages into using your printer, you’re shelling out between $100-$165 to continue to use your printer.

I also found out I’m not the only one who’s noticed this.  Look at the newegg customer reviews for the DR360, and you will see comments like this:

Just Buy a New Printer

Pros: Love the printer. Great for black and white text printing. I’ve tried other printers and this one seems to be the most efficient and cost effective.

Cons: Do not waste your money on this. Just buy a new printer and get the drum and a starter cartridge. You can get them for between 50-90 dollars depending on the deal offered. I don’t even know why they bother selling this item.

Or this short and sweet comment…

Drum Unit Only

Pros: This is the same drum unit that comes with the printer.

Cons: This is not a toner cartridge. You will have to buy a toner cartridge in addition to this to make it work.

Other Thoughts: If the drum unit costs this much I would just buy another printer instead of purchasing this item.

One wonders what these people do with their old printers once they replace their consumable parts with a whole new printer.  I think the costs of replacement drums should come WAY down.  How much can they really cost to produce, anyway?

for more, check out Art’s e-trashtalk blog here: http://e-trashtalk.spaces.live.com/

Share

Want to get Ripped off? Buy a computer from TV shopping networks!

October 28th, 2009 1 comment »

So, I don’t watch these networks myself, but on occasion, I’m at a friend or family members house and they flip on the Home Shopping Network or QVC, and they’ll be on there trying to unload some laptops and talk about how great they are.  Especially with the coming of Windows 7, they are really hoping to breathe new life into PC and notebook/netbook sales.

The problem is, they always talk like they are giving you an incredible deal whenever they market these computers.  It is almost certain that their target audience, (people still shopping on TV,) are not so internet savvy, since the deals are not deals at all.  Case in point:

Illustrious deal at QVC

Illustrious deal at QVC

QVC was selling a HP DV7 series on TV, (I went and found it on their website,) for a penny short of a grand.  I could tell before I even went to look it up that it was overpriced, A LOT.  Especially since the AMD processors tend to run a little cheaper than the Intel based machines.  So I decided to jump on my friends computer and look up the most similar machine I could find on Bestbuy.com, and lo and behold, They have a completely identical DV7-3065dx priced at $729.99.  (I wish I could say I was suprised.)

I am suprised, however, that QVC would mark up the machine a whole $170.  I hope they don’t sell everything with that much mark up.

Share

Windows 7 Hits Shelves Today, Are You Ready?

October 22nd, 2009 No comments »

Today marks the launch of Windows 7, The operating system that Vista should have been.

compare-ultimate-upgr

Will it be an immediate success, or should we wait until bugs get “worked out?”  We would probably all know sooner if they had did us a solid and priced it at $29 like Mac did with Snow Leopard.  (Upgrade from Vista only, of course!)  I will be going out to my local best buy and testing some of the un-talked about features of 7 and also posting some overall impressions here in the next few days.  So stay tuned!

Share

System Restore: Use with care

October 9th, 2009 No comments »

Recently, I have been contacted by at least two clients as a result of their computers being rendered completely inoperable thanks to Microsoft’s built in “life preserver” program, better known as “System Restore.”  In theory, what it does is monitor your computer for system changes such as software updates or program installations, and creates a “saved-state” to undo the install or update if it causes problems with your machines.  Sounds good, but again, this is “in theory.”  System Restore does work, some of the time, but it’s not full-proof, and one needs to be careful when using it.

So where does it go wrong?  Well, for one, the infamous “Vundo” trojan that earns me almost 50% of my business, is not only immune to system restore, it can actually infect your restore points.  I’m sure there are other viruses out there too, that can impact your Windows system files and maintain your system as infected, even when you roll it back to a prior state.  In more extreme cases, however, Malware can infect your base system files in a way where rolling back with system restore can seriously damage your windows installation, rendering your computer inoperable.  This leads me to my first peice of unequivocal advice:

Never attempt to use System Restore as a means for removing a virus infection!

If you can’t remove it with a virus scan, then you should seek professional help.  (Not Geek Squad!)

My second but smaller gripe about system restore is not quite as serious, but still annoying enough.  Some of the OEM’s got this wrong with newer vista machines, have not seen it on Win7 machines yet.  In the days of XP, if your machine failed to boot properly or shutdown improperly, the next time you turned it on, you would get a message about it and you had either an option of “safe mode” or start normally.  On newer systems, (i.e. I think I’ll pick on Dell today.)  Vista has a “WindowsPE” powered “repair your computer” interface, which is actually pretty nice.  It actually does away with the command line based recovery console that existed on XP when you needed to repair your windows installation.

The only problem is, not everyone reads all the menu options carefully, and it’s pretty easy to accidentally ERASE your machine and reload the factory pre-installed  software if you don’t read the options under “repair your computer” carefully.  (Most people don’t.)  To add to that potential frustration, I think some OEM’s have their machines to boot to this repair partition automatically if nothing is pressed during startup after a failure to boot or  shutdown properly.  So one more piece of advice today:

If you are unsure about using repair options on your machine, don’t do it!  Seek professional help.

I will be excited to see what happens with Windows 7.  Thanks for reading!

Share

Bonus Post: Aren’t you tired of paying for Norton or McAfee?

September 29th, 2009 No comments »

So in just breaking news, I read today, that Microsoft, having just upgraded from beta status, has just decided to make it’s “Security Essentials” free to windows users, (genuine I’m sure!)   What does this mean?  Free virus protection from MS on your windows machines, with updates, and no fuss.  I’m curious to see how Symantec and McAfee react to this.  Even more bloated software?

More Information:  read at engadget.

Share

Computers Getting Faster, Why Don’t We See It?

September 25th, 2009 1 comment »

I know one of the biggest things that annoys the heck out of me is when my big and powerful new machine is extremely snappy when I first get it, but in just a few months, it doesn’t stay that way.  Sure it’s still pretty fast, and I’m pretty sure if I don’t install any more software on it, it will stay that way.  Add to that the fact that I’m fairly selective about the software I put on my machine, but what if you, (and I’m sure this is the majority of you,) are not me?

If I were the average “run-of-the-mill” end user, would I pay any special regard to what programs I install on my machine, how many programs start up with my computer, and what impact said programs have on my system? Chances are, the answer is no.

I’ve had clients with toolbar this, messenger that, and all kinds of “helper” applications that start, (in my opinion unnecessarily,) with their machine at boot-up.  Do I really need Adobe speed launcher taking up memory on my machine just to reduce my wait time in the off chance I might load up a PDF doc?  Can’t Google, Quicktime, or Java check for program updates when I actually launch them, instead of running updaters in the background all the time?  Why do these software engineers insist on adding to my computer’s running processes, when all I turned my machine on for was to watch a DVD on my flight, or to look up a contact in my e-mail client?

But that wasn’t the original inspiration behind my writing this blog today.  My bigger concern is this:  As computer hardware gets more powerful, and more efficient, it seems like software engineers love to write software to take advantage of the new functionality.  Which is good, if you were a software engineer for a video game company, or a computer aided design program.  But, what about necessities like Anti-virus software, or web browsers?  Do we want these programs to be big and gaudy, or do we even care about what the interface looks like?  Ok, maybe we care a little bit.

I’m going to go out on a limb here, and say that even though we want our anti-virus software, (for example), to protect us from internet threats and keep us safe from the pesky Vundo Trojan, we don’t want it sucking up a boatload of system resources.  Even though we want our web browsers to show us the rich web content we so live for on a day to day basis, I don’t see why it needs to be loaded down with a bunch of extra junk that we may or may not use.

Let me use an example of each.  My favorite web browser, that I use 99% of the time, is Google Chrome.  Why?  Because it’s light weight, it’s snappy, and it has an extremely simple and intuitive interface.  There are some more technical reasons I like it better too, but that’s a discussion for another day.  Contrast with Internet Explorer 8.  IE8 has some new bells and whistles in it that as a web developer, I find extremely useful.  If I’m not a web developer, however, do I really need these in my browser?  Can we make it lighter, and faster?

Let’s also look at Symantec (Norton), and McAfee.  I know I need internet security, but can’t we streamline the installers to customize the levels of protection based on how I use my computers?  Do you really have to have 6-10 seperate processes running in the background?  My anti-virus program only has 2 processes, and it does a better job than McAfee or Norton at screening out threats.

Let me also attack a bigger “Bear” of a program, one that I hate with all my heart, AOL9/10.  It surprises me that AOL hasn’t come along with a full fledged operating system of it’s own, because I swear it will completely take over your system.  I’ve actually seen cases where AOL software “breaks” someone’s internet connection, and removing it fixes the issue.  AOL has some nice features in it’s software for people who are used to using the interface.  I feel like the progression of AOL software over the years, in an attempt to make it safer and more stable, feels to me like trying to use fans to blow a fire out.  Why doesn’t AOL make a “lite” version of their software.  Keep the Personal Filing Cabinet, instant messenger, and the dial-up, (yes, there are people that still use it,) but lose all the extras that can be easily accessed through an ordinary web browser.

I think these programs can be more efficient.  Small, compact, and efficient computer programs are far more impressive than bloated, sluggish ones that appear feature rich, but aren’t intuitive, or good at their primary function.  (I’m talking to you iTunes!)  I think developers can do better.

Examples of lightweight, yet functional apps:

Hall of Shame:

  • iTunes (on windows)
  • AOL9.0(x)
  • Norton Internet Security
  • McAfee Internet Security

for additional reading, look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bloat

Share

Anti-Virus, Anti-Spyware, Anti-Moron?

September 21st, 2009 No comments »

So, how do you know if you have a good computer repair technician?  Does he/she have all the answers?  It has long since been my argument that no one can know everything when it comes to the computer industry.  It’s fast paced and ever evolving with new software and hardware platforms and technologies being developed every day.  So, technically speaking, how would a good technician be able to have all the answers?  The answer?  Research.

GreenQuestMark

A technician’s ability to make informed and intelligible decisions comes from what goes on in the brain when one encounters something “new.”  Unfortunately, there are a lot of moronic technicians, who’s brains tend to say, “I don’t know this, so it must be bad.”

I’ve seen, first hand, an example of this behavior, when one of my clients took her computer to a certain repair “squad” of the “geek” variety, and complained that her computer was acting “buggy.”  Sure that’s a vague symptom, but not too hard to explore, right?  Well, apparently, since the black-tie technician had never before heard of Avira Anti-Virus, which is free anti-virus software I recommend to all my clients, he instantly assumed that she had a Vundo Trojan and recommended a complete wipe and reinstall.  (Sounds real convenient, right?)

As it turns out, her main problem was just a bit of excessive file fragmentation on her hard drive.  Still, how hard would it have been to google “Avira” and see if it was a legitimate anti-virus program?  (They’ve only been around for 10 years!)  This is a classic example of “Haste makes waste.”  Taking a few extra minutes would save you the trouble of unnecessarily reinstalling the entire OS and all your programs as well.  At lease they can make some good money off of you for the reinstall and backing up your data, both of which are not covered by the “black tie” protection program.

Share

Finally! Pandora: Internet Radio Done Right

September 10th, 2009 No comments »

This subject is slightly off topic, but I felt compelled to share. I’m pretty tech savvy, and usually do a pretty good job at keeping up on things, but occasionally, my extremely-hip mother introduces me to stuff I’m not hip to. Recently, she introduced me to Pandora, an internet radio app that has native apps for Blackberry, iPhone, and more recently, Android devices, (although there may be more platforms that I am not aware of at the time of writing this.)

This is an example of a product that is so phenomenal, that I went from barely knowledgeable to raving fan in about 24 hours. Now, anyone who has digital cable, u-verse, or dish network can tell you, the music channels are very poorly implemented. (DirecTV is fortunate enough to have XM Radio built in, so they aren’t quite as bad.) The main problem being, the choice of stations is very narrow, and the song selection dosen’t do a very good job of sticking to an appropriate format for the chosen station. I have AT&T’s URGE radio, for example, and might tune into an R&B station and get a few rap songs. Another example, the “Modern Rap” station, in a period of 30 minutes, completely failed to play any music from this decade!

pandora-iconPandora, however, builds you a completely custom “station” using a particular song or artist as a “seed” and intelligently selects songs for playback based on musical styles and influences similar to your seed song. Don’t believe me, Try it! It’s awesome! You can also tell it “I like this” or “I don’t like this” as it plays songs, and it gets better at playing songs that fit your vision of your station. Best part? The advertising is minimal. Check it out, you won’t be sorry!

Share

Switch to our mobile site